Ugh. This one is painful. In the comments to yesterday’s post about chiropractic, drlisamarie was kind enough to provide me with a link to an article (the abstract for the original paper can be found here) discussing the apparent benefits of chiropractic adjustment for sufferers of dyslexia and other learning disorders. While it appears this article was meant as an ‘in your face’ to yours truly, it is little more than another sad example of what passes for evidence in chiropractic. With apologies to Orac: The stupid. It burns.
Posts Tagged ‘chiropractic’
Can chiropractic really get rid of with [sic] earaches and ear infections? That was the title to an article posted on an alternative medicine blog last week. The answer is, of course an emphatic NO! Unfortunately, the author of the article didn’t consult me (or any credible scientific evidence) prior to submission and went on to answer the question in the affirmative, providing evidence that the title to this post may be redundant. Oh boy.
I understand that this is just one junk article on one alternative medicine blog. I don’t even know if it’s a well known alternative medicine blog. This is more a situation of just one ridiculous claim too many that finally sent me to the keyboard. Claims like this are, unfortunately, not sparse in the chiropractic community, and I feel like I’ve been coming across them way too often recently. It is depressingly easy to find a practitioner that will claim to treat ear infections, colic, and asthma. Look a little harder, and it’s not much more difficult to find individuals who will treat autism, infertility, ADHD, Parkinson’s, etc. There was a chiropractor in my hometown (population: a paltry 25,000) that publicly asserted he could treat pancreatic cancer. As you might have guessed, there is absolutely zero credible scientific evidence to back up these claims.
For my original post on Simon Singh and the BCA, click here.
Lifted from Science-Based Medicine
Legal Update BCA v Singh
Simon Singh announced today that he will continue the fight in his libel case with the British Chiropractic Association after his application to appeal the preliminary ruling was rejected last week. He has now has the option to try and overturn that decision at an oral appeal. If this fails his case will be tried on a meaning of a phrase he did not intend and is indefensible. This highlights the problem of narrow defences that, along with high costs and wide jurisdiction, make the English libel laws so restrictive to free speech.
Simon said today: “I can confirm today that I have applied for a hearing to ask the Court of Appeal to reconsider its recent denial of permission. A great deal has happened since my original article was published back in April 2008 and I suspect that the libel case will continue for many more months (or maybe years). While my case is ongoing, it continues to raise a whole series of arguably more important issues, particularly the appalling state of English libel laws. I am pleased that the Culture Secretary has agreed to meet with signatories of the Keep Libel Laws out of Science campaign statement to hear how the laws affect writers. We are also pursuing a meeting at the Ministry of Justice and with front benchers in other departments to lobby for a change in the law.”
Read Simon’s full statement and more about his next steps here: http://www.senseaboutscience.org.uk/freedebate
I’m behind the times once again. Last week, science blogs across the web reproduced Simon Singh’s column on chiropractic. In it, In Singh criticizes chiropractors for claiming to be able to treat conditions such as colic, asthma, and ear infections, despite lacking a shred of credible scientific evidence. When the British Chiropractic Association (BCA) complained to The Guardian, the newspaper that had printed the article, they were given the opportunity to write a 500 word response to rebut Sing’s claims and present their evidence for the efficacy of chiropractic. Instead, the BCA sued Simon Singh for libel.